1930 Ruby Yearbook

A digitized copy of the 1930 Ruby, the Ursinus College yearbook.https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/ruby/1032/thumbnail.jp

Ursinus College Alumni Journal, Summer 1947

Word of appreciation • Old Timers\u27 Day • President\u27s page • Alumni Association tables special committee\u27s report • Student union chosen as war memorial • Women\u27s Club • Dr. Clawson new Ursinus Dean • Board of Directors creates new committee, adds five members • Campus to be used for astronomical observation • Kuhrt Wieneke named coach of football • Three resign from faculty • Fourteen members added to faculty • Dr. Distler addresses graduating class • Sports: Men\u27s basketball; baseball; men\u27s tennis; track; women\u27s swimming; women\u27s basketball; women\u27s tennis • Local alumni associations meet • Work progressing on alumni register • Summer assembly • News about ourselves • Necrology • News around townhttps://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/alumnijournal/1031/thumbnail.jp

Ursinus College Alumni Journal, Winter 1946

Dean • President\u27s page • Record enrollment in 76th year • Necrology • Dean Kline dies in 83rd year • Livingood honored • Dr. Niblo attends Episcopal convention • Music room developed • Faculty increased • Revue of sports • Seeders appointed head basketball coach • Student activities • Letters to the alumni • Old Timers\u27 Day • Alumni committees appointed • Re-education of Germany • News about ourselves • Dr. Haines: Teacher and author • News around town • Recipient of Rotary Club award • Dr. Markley completes term of service • 1946 and football • As the placement office sees us • Men\u27s basketball schedulehttps://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/alumnijournal/1026/thumbnail.jp

Ursinus College Alumni Journal, Spring 1947

It\u27s time to vote • President\u27s page • News from the campus: Club meetings; Debating; Forum Committee; Curtain Club; YM and YW; Men\u27s sports; Women\u27s sports; New coach appointed; May Day; Alumni Day • Christian education in China • Around town • Ursinus professor honored • Tribute to Dean Kline • News about ourselves • Function of an alumni association • Reunion abroad • Necrology • War Memorial Committee requests expression of opinion from alumni • Alumni Association nomineeshttps://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/alumnijournal/1030/thumbnail.jp

Ursinus College Alumni Journal, July 1961

The President writes • Thirty years of champions and their coach • Were we wrong about the Victorians? • A view of Vietnam • A philosopher looks at Barry Goldwater • The alumni seminar • Dr. Paisley dies • William D. Reimert elected President of the Board of Directors • Ursinus willed $92,657 • Commencement, 1961 • Peirce paints McClure portrait • Cutting campus • Alumni Day review • Constitution change • Loyalty Fund tops 50% participation • Election results • Alumni awards committee • Montgomery regional organized • A Far East odyssey • Harry L. Showalter, \u2741 • Best track season in Ursinus history • Baseball and tennis • Clarence A. Warden, Jr. • Class notes • The class of 1897 • Weddings • Births • Necrology • College chaplain haiku experthttps://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/alumnijournal/1071/thumbnail.jp

High-coverage genomes to elucidate the evolution of penguins

Penguins (Sphenisciformes) are a remarkable order of flightless wing-propelled diving seabirds distributed widely across the southern hemisphere. They share a volant common ancestor with Procellariiformes close to the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary (66 million years ago) and subsequently lost the ability to fly but enhanced their diving capabilities. With ∼20 species among 6 genera, penguins range from the tropical Galápagos Islands to the oceanic temperate forests of New Zealand, the rocky coastlines of the sub-Antarctic islands, and the sea ice around Antarctica. To inhabit such diverse and extreme environments, penguins evolved many physiological and morphological adaptations. However, they are also highly sensitive to climate change. Therefore, penguins provide an exciting target system for understanding the evolutionary processes of speciation, adaptation, and demography. Genomic data are an emerging resource for addressing questions about such processes

Variation in Structure and Process of Care in Traumatic Brain Injury: Provider Profiles of European Neurotrauma Centers Participating in the CENTER-TBI Study.

INTRODUCTION: The strength of evidence underpinning care and treatment recommendations in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is low. Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has been proposed as a framework to provide evidence for optimal care for TBI patients. The first step in CER is to map the existing variation. The aim of current study is to quantify variation in general structural and process characteristics among centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. METHODS: We designed a set of 11 provider profiling questionnaires with 321 questions about various aspects of TBI care, chosen based on literature and expert opinion. After pilot testing, questionnaires were disseminated to 71 centers from 20 countries participating in the CENTER-TBI study. Reliability of questionnaires was estimated by calculating a concordance rate among 5% duplicate questions. RESULTS: All 71 centers completed the questionnaires. Median concordance rate among duplicate questions was 0.85. The majority of centers were academic hospitals (n = 65, 92%), designated as a level I trauma center (n = 48, 68%) and situated in an urban location (n = 70, 99%). The availability of facilities for neuro-trauma care varied across centers; e.g. 40 (57%) had a dedicated neuro-intensive care unit (ICU), 36 (51%) had an in-hospital rehabilitation unit and the organization of the ICU was closed in 64% (n = 45) of the centers. In addition, we found wide variation in processes of care, such as the ICU admission policy and intracranial pressure monitoring policy among centers. CONCLUSION: Even among high-volume, specialized neurotrauma centers there is substantial variation in structures and processes of TBI care. This variation provides an opportunity to study effectiveness of specific aspects of TBI care and to identify best practices with CER approaches

Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study

Abstract Background General supportive and preventive measures in the intensive care management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) aim to prevent or limit secondary brain injury and optimize recovery. The aim of this survey was to assess and quantify variation in perceptions on intensive care unit (ICU) management of patients with TBI in European neurotrauma centers. Methods We performed a survey as part of the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. We analyzed 23 questions focused on: 1) circulatory and respiratory management; 2) fever control; 3) use of corticosteroids; 4) nutrition and glucose management; and 5) seizure prophylaxis and treatment. Results The survey was completed predominantly by intensivists (n = 33, 50%) and neurosurgeons (n = 23, 35%) from 66 centers (97% response rate). The most common cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) target was > 60 mmHg (n = 39, 60%) and/or an individualized target (n = 25, 38%). To support CPP, crystalloid fluid loading (n = 60, 91%) was generally preferred over albumin (n = 15, 23%), and vasopressors (n = 63, 96%) over inotropes (n = 29, 44%). The most commonly reported target of partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) was 36–40 mmHg (4.8–5.3 kPa) in case of controlled intracranial pressure (ICP) < 20 mmHg (n = 45, 69%) and PaCO2 target of 30–35 mmHg (4–4.7 kPa) in case of raised ICP (n = 40, 62%). Almost all respondents indicated to generally treat fever (n = 65, 98%) with paracetamol (n = 61, 92%) and/or external cooling (n = 49, 74%). Conventional glucose management (n = 43, 66%) was preferred over tight glycemic control (n = 18, 28%). More than half of the respondents indicated to aim for full caloric replacement within 7 days (n = 43, 66%) using enteral nutrition (n = 60, 92%). Indications for and duration of seizure prophylaxis varied, and levetiracetam was mostly reported as the agent of choice for both seizure prophylaxis (n = 32, 49%) and treatment (n = 40, 61%). Conclusions Practice preferences vary substantially regarding general supportive and preventive measures in TBI patients at ICUs of European neurotrauma centers. These results provide an opportunity for future comparative effectiveness research, since a more evidence-based uniformity in good practices in general ICU management could have a major impact on TBI outcome

Variation in neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury

Background: Neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging, with only low-quality evidence. We aimed to explore differences in neurosurgical strategies for TBI across Europe. Methods: A survey was sent to 68 centers participating in the Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. The questionnaire contained 21 questions, including the decision when to operate (or not) on traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) and intracerebral hematoma (ICH), and when to perform a decompressive craniectomy (DC) in raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Results: The survey was completed by 68 centers (100%). On average, 10 neurosurgeons work in each trauma center. In all centers, a neurosurgeon was available within 30 min. Forty percent of responders reported a thickness or volume threshold for evacuation of an ASDH. Most responders (78%) decide on a primary DC in evacuating an ASDH during the operation, when swelling is present. For ICH, 3% would perform an evacuation directly to prevent secondary deterioration and 66% only in case of clinical deterioration. Most respondents (91%) reported to consider a DC for refractory high ICP. The reported cut-off ICP for DC in refractory high ICP, however, differed: 60% uses 25 mmHg, 18% 30 mmHg, and 17% 20 mmHg. Treatment strategies varied substantially between regions, specifically for the threshold for ASDH surgery and DC for refractory raised ICP. Also within center variation was present: 31% reported variation within the hospital for inserting an ICP monitor and 43% for evacuating mass lesions. Conclusion: Despite a homogeneous organization, considerable practice variation exists of neurosurgical strategies for TBI in Europe. These results provide an incentive for comparative effectiveness research to determine elements of effective neurosurgical care